![]() |
| The Croft |
It's worth bringing things together and telling the story one more time in order that people can make any submissions, comments or objections prior to 4th December 2017, which is the date the consultation period closes. It should be noted that even if you have made a submission to the original application, you are perfectly entitled to make a further comment or submission on the amended plans.
| Protected (shaded) and unprotected areas of The Croft |
How much do you know about The Croft? Many people wrongly believe that all of the Croft as outlined in the aerial photograph at the top of the page from StreetMap is protected either as Common Land or with Village Green status. In fact the area that is not shaded by those little dots on the photograph aside, is entirely unprotected. This means that any sort of silly plans could be submitted for any sort of silly means and for that area of unprotected Croft to be built upon! If you want to see that photograph in more detail, just click on it.
If you feel that Walsall Council made a bit of a mistake by not having all of the Croft protected when it applied for Village Green Status for The Croft then please let your local Councillors, the Council and MP know!
The application for the Sundial has been amended in order to bring the whole structure within the unprotected area and therefore avoid the extra scrutiny required for planned structures on a Village Green, in a Conservation Zone.
Two and half years ago the local Rotary Club in the guise of a sub group called Aldridge Croft Community Group (ACCG) brought a proposal before Aldridge Village Partnership (AVP) for two sundials; one for The Croft and one to be placed next to the War Memorial. AVP is in fact a company limited by guarantee to which Walsall Council provided funds from its budget for Aldridge that can be used for many purposes. AVP is run by company directors. Some directors are also members of the Rotary Club and also ACCG. Despite AVP being a limited company there are some meetings held that are open to the public but I personally have never seen these meetings advertised. That doesn't mean that they are not advertised but it would appear they are not widely advertised.
The proposal was apparently accepted by AVP with enthusiasm, although I have seen a document that confirms that it was never voted upon, and without wider consultation. On this flimsy basis and with the agreement and signing off by an Officer of the Council, an application for a grant was made to Tesco Bags of Help
Despite the fact that one of the criteria set out by Tesco Bags of Help is that any planning permission required should have been obtained prior to applying for the grant, which it wasn't and still hasn't been, the application was accepted and shoppers in various local Tesco stores voted with their tokens. A grant of £10,000 was awarded for the sundials project.
Following that there was indeed some local consultation in the form of a stall one Saturday in the shopping centre and a display at the library. This consultation was neither independent or timely, coming after the grant from Tesco had been awarded.
The project supporters were then told that despite their protestations to the contrary, planning permission was indeed required. Plans for the sundial next to the memorial were dropped and a planning application for the sundial on the Croft was finally submitted in May 2017.
You may be wondering why this proposal has not been discussed by the planning committee before now. Well notices were not served or displayed correctly, so the consultation period had to be extended and also plans have been variously amended by the proposer as the objections to the project came in.
You are warned before reading further, that any impartiality I have, is now laid to rest, so if all you wanted was a summary and details of where to obtain information, please do not continue reading. Thank you
The revised plans bring the sundial into the area of the Croft that is unprotected. They also state that the sundial is not a memorial. If this is so, why is the word 'memorial' used all over the planning application? Why is the fact that the War Memorial is just a few yards away across the road, still referred to in the revised plans? In my opinion the references to the National Memorial Arboretum make it quite plain what the proposers think their sundial is; a memorial. They now refer to it as a public art project. Yes, it always was in one way but in my personal opinion a nasty, tacky piece of public art if the drawings that accompany the planning application are anything to go by and unlike the beautiful sculptures presented as art at say the National Memorial Arboretum. That is a personal opinion though, after all art is a very personal thing.
What isn't personal however, is expansion of the play area on The Croft. There are people in Aldridge who are working to try and get the play area expanded in order to install suitable play equipment for children in our community that have disabilities. What a wonderful idea and from what I understand there are organisations that would be happy to provide funding for such a project. Unfortunately if you have a sundial you cannot expand the children's play area as the space on the unprotected part of the Croft will not be available any longer. So, a public art project or a play area for ALL children?
The other problem as I see it, is if we allow a tacky art project to be built on the unprotected area of The Croft, is how many other projects are going to come out of the woodwork? By allowing the sundial, you set a precedent for other projects that are a good idea in their eyes, are enhancements in their eyes and not just a precedent for the unprotected area of the Croft but for the protected area too. Precedence is a dangerous thing.
I have other objections to the project but they will go into my submission to Planning.
You may not agree with me and my mad opinions but at least you know about this now and can make up your own mind and make submissions to Planning if you so desire. The sundial could have already been installed on the Croft, without planning permission or consultation, had it not been for the dogged determination of some local people who refuse to bow to the cabal that likes to run Aldridge, preferably without consultation.

Thank you Linda, There is a lot to digest and many questions to be answered. Having spoken to Tesco's Customer Service Department I have the following contact details for the person within the Company who is responsible for Bags of Help grants. paul.grogan@tesco.com Telephone 01707 913072 Tesco are the people who gave the money and I would to know why they gave it without planning consent being in place, why they did not insist on consultation with local people before the grant was awarded and why the organisation making the planning application does not appear to be the same organisation who were given the money. Just the start of many questions I think. Spike
ReplyDeleteI wonder how the cabal square the idea of a memorial for our brave armed forces who fought for our democracy with the fact they themselves have have acted un-democratically in trying to railroad this monstrosity through. Or does ego and self interest trump democracy these days?
ReplyDeleteI am pleased to confirm that Tesco are taking this matter seriously and are have today launched as investigation. Spike
ReplyDelete